Monkeys and Shakespeare
I was lucky enough to get included in the Horizon programme on Infinity last night, talking about the old monkeyShakespeare issue. Of course most of my rambling contribution was (rightly) cut, so here’s a few background details for anyone interested.

We assumed the monkey was typing lowercase letters and some punctuation, and that each of $34$ characters was equally likely to be picked. So each character typed has a $1$ in $34$ chance of being the right one. There are $5,000,000$ characters in Shakespeare, and so the chance that they are all right, from beginning to end, is $1$ in $34^{5,000,000} = 10^{7,600,000}$, which we shall $t$ for ‘tiny’. So each time the monkey starts typing, there is a $t$ chance of completing Shakespeare. This number is small but finite.
 We are ‘certain’ of this event occurring in exactly the same sense that we are ‘certain’ that if we repeatedly flip a fair coin, it will eventually come up heads. This will take on average 2 flips, just as the time to get the first six when throwing a die is expected to be 6 throws. So we expect to see Shakespeare after an average of $1/t$ tries by the monkey, which of course will take a long time, in fact well after the universe has come to an end. The probability that this event has not occurred by a time $T$ decreases to 0 as $T$ increases to infinity: this follows from the Law of Large Numbers : the Strong version of that Law means that the event will happen with probability 1, in that the only way that the monkey does not end up typing Shakespeare is if something with probability 0 occurs.
 The chance of winning the lottery is around 1 in $14,000,000 = 10^{7.1}$. So the tiny chance $t$ is equivalent to winning around 1,000,000 lotteries in a row, since $10^{7,600,000}$ is around $10^{7.1}$ to the power 1,000,000. If you bought one lottery ticket a week, this is like winning every week for 20,000 years (I said 27,000 on the programme due to some overrapid backofenvelope calculations). Of course in real life people might start getting suspicious.
 To get 17 characters right, eg "to_be_or_not_to_b", would require an event with chance 1 in $34^{17}$ = $2 \times 10^{19}$. Our program types characters at 50 a second, so we would expect to wait around $4 \times 10^{17}$ seconds before this occurred, which is 13.8 billion years, just a little after the Big Bang signalled the start of our Universe.
 The nice Monkey Simulator program was written by Aaron Russell and is available from this website.

Around 30% of the characters in Shakespeare are the letter ‘e’. We could have given the monkey a headstart with this information, but filling in the other 70% is still quite tricky.
 Just to show that that theory does not always meet practice, a wonderful arts project in Paignton Zoo put a computer in a monkeys’ enclosure to see how they got on. The monkeys typed 5 pages, mainly the letter 's', and then used the keyboard as a toilet. So rather a limited output of classic English literature. This just shows the problems that turn up when maths meets the real world.
 david's blog
 Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Anonymous (not verified)
Tue, 09/03/2010  6:10pm
Permalink
David Spielgelhalter: one in an infinitude?
Anonymous (not verified)
Thu, 22/04/2010  3:04am
Permalink
On the old monkeyShakespeare issue
Anonymous (not verified)
Sat, 15/05/2010  3:29am
Permalink
Copy a single line of Shakespeare