A probability paradox?
I recently tweeted a link to this problem drawn on a blackboard, which got a lot of retweets.
Multiple Choice: If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct? A) 25% B) 50% C) 60% D) 25%
This is a fun question whose paradoxical, self-referential nature quickly reveals itself – A) seems to be fine until one realizes the D) option is also 25%.
A quick search reveals hundreds of discussion contributions of this problem, for example here and here and from a year ago. People often appear very confident that their answer is the only possible solution.
I am no logician and so unqualified to place this within the grand structures of mathematical paradoxes. I have not waded through all the discussions and so there may be something I have missed, but in among all the arguments there seem to be four conclusions that could be considered as 'correct'. These are my personal comments:
1) There can be no solution, since the ambiguity of ‘correct’ makes the question ill-posed.
It's true the question is ambiguous, but this still seems a bit of a cop-out.
2) There is no solution.
This seems to take this interpretation of the question.
Which answer (or set of answers) of “p%”, is such that the statement ‘the probability of picking such an answer is p%’ is true?
Then this appears to be a well-posed question, but there is no solution.
3) 0%.
Consider a different interpretation of the question.
Is there a p%, such that the statement ‘the probability of picking an answer “p%” is p%’ is true?
Then this appears a well-posed question and has the solution p = 0, even though this is not one of the answers. Of course if answer C) were changed to “0%” (as it is in this 2007 version of the question ), then this would also have no solution.
4) We can produce any answer we want by changing the probability distribution for the choice.
Why should ‘random’ mean an equally likely chance of picking the 4 answers? If we, say, assume the probabilities of choosing (A) (B) (C) (D) to be (10%, 20%, 60%, 10%) then the answer to either formulation (2) and (3) is now “60%”. But if we make the distribution (12.5%, 15%, 60%, 12.5%) then we seem to back to square one again, since there is now both a 25% chance of picking “25%”, and a 60% chance of picking “60%”.
I like conclusion 3) best, ie 0%.
Maybe the main lesson is: ambiguity and paradox are often the basis for a good joke.
- david's blog
- Log in or register to post comments

Comments
Mark Lewney (not verified)
Mon, 10/31/2011 - 12:45
Permalink
Multi-choice problem
Tom (not verified)
Fri, 11/25/2011 - 21:35
Permalink
But what if none of the
Bilf (not verified)
Thu, 12/29/2011 - 09:59
Permalink
Impossible
Dave Marsay
Wed, 02/01/2012 - 21:56
Permalink
Probability paradox?
Dave Marsay
Wed, 02/01/2012 - 22:00
Permalink
Oops
Blitz
Wed, 05/09/2012 - 03:23
Permalink
100 %
efoula
Thu, 05/10/2012 - 09:08
Permalink
Basically, none of the
Blitz
Sun, 05/13/2012 - 18:14
Permalink
Focus on the ?
I love this question because it had so many layers. First thought was of course, what they said in school. "If you don't know the answer, you have a one in four chance if you guess." But then you see the other 25%... OK now it's 50%... but wait now there is a is a 0%... but that's not one of the answers ether. Take the answers out, and answer THIS question.
Multiple Choice: If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct? A B C D
or what if the answers were A)Blue B)Yellow C)Red D)Blue
This answer implies that there is another question. But the question states "this question"
So if I choose Yellow, Red, or ether Blue, I'm right... What if the implied question was whats my favorite color?
garybird
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 15:49
Permalink
Zero
pedroAbreu
Mon, 10/15/2012 - 15:14
Permalink
You always have an answer to
You always have an answer to the question :
1. How many answers are right from a set of four possible answers?
It is either 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4.
You also always have an answer to the question :
2. What is the probability of randomly picking the right answer from a set of four alternatives, given a fixed number of right answers?
It is either 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%.
In this case they’re sort of asking you both questions simultaneously, since the content of the possible answers should be fixing and allowing you to discover both
a. the number of right answers
and
b. the right answer
Once you give an answer to either 1 or 2 you immediately get an answer to the other. In this case none of those answers is actually fixed, you should discover both at the same time: hence the (apparent) problem.
The trouble is that there are very there are some (actually very strict) constrains regarding the possible relation between a and b that are not being respected by the given possible answers: hence the incoherence.
Notice that for someone to be able to pick an answer correctly the following conditions must be met:
I) There is one correct answer ←→ There is one and only one option = 25%
II) There are two correct answers ←→ There should be two and only two options = 50%
III) There are three correct answers ←→ There should be three and only three options = 75%
IV) There are four correct answers ←→ There should be four and only four options = 100%
once you don’t respect this conditions you have an incompatibility between picking the right answer and picking the number of right answers, and so there is no way to answer the question and you should not be bogged by the appearance that there should be such an answer.